Amidst the Hurricane Sandy
relief bill, gun control legislation following the Newtown Connecticut shooting
and President Barack Obama’s first State of the Union address during his second
term, public education is still a vital current event. Currently, President
George W. Bush’s education act, No Child Left Behind, is under further review
in Congress. Legislators are contemplating the effectiveness of that education
law and the feasibility of academic progress. Congress is asking how the states’
responsibilities to improving students’ academic success can be measured and/or
regulated by the federal government. There is much debate on how much influence
the federal government has in this matter. Would it be better left to the
states? The No Child Left Behind Act, which passed in 2001, made schools
accountable for student performance on standardized tests. The repeated failure
to meet a certain threshold could result in the transfer of students to a
better school within the district or replacement of all schoolteachers.
In 2011, the Senate
education committee reported a bill to the floor that did not require schools
to evaluate teachers based on standardized test scores. This has not yet been
voted on in the Senate. With its bipartisan support, would this bill lead to
the goal outcome: better test scores? Is there another way for states to
evaluate their teachers aside from standardized testing? All of these questions
can’t be answered with a simple yes or no. It depends on the district and its
population.
The topic has been discussed
heavily in since passion the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, but no
legislation within the last five years has been brought to a vote. No Child
reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, a piece of
legislation that oversees all public schools that receive federal financial
support.
For more on current
education debate: New York Times Article: "Holding States and Schools Accountable"
No comments:
Post a Comment